As printed in the newspaper column: A Voice In The Mountains, By Alan D. Turner

COUNTING VOTES

In the midst of the most controversial Presidential Election (at least in my lifetime) we have Judges who will not either hear a case at all of any potential fraudulent activities or invalid votes being counted; stating that there was either no merit, or standing in the lawsuits being filed, or who have made legal decisions that there was no evidence of any misdoing; without them hearing of any evidence, because the Judges decisions have been rendered without any actual court hearing taking place.

This controversy started way before the first vote was counted; for it started when our State Legislators, who prior to this election relinquished their sole Constitutional Authority to determine the voting procedures of their individual States to a various set of Politicians; be they Governors, Secretary of States, Attorney Generals, and/or Voting Officials, who usurped that authority of the Legislators; who changed or added election procedures that violated their States’ Constitutional Voting Laws: Procedures that make it easier for massive voting fraud to take place, and even harder to prove after the fact; because it’s all in the open, with assumed legality.

Any attempts to legally challenge these unconstitutional voting changes prior to the Election Day; the changes were upheld by those State or District Judges, who like their other unconstitutional cohorts had no Constitutional Authority to do what they did, either. Yet, once again – there is an assumed legality.

In spite of the obvious fraudulent and invalid voting that took place, the American peoples have been told over and over again by the mass media and social networks that either there was no fraud at all, or – if there was, it was not to the point that it would reverse their pre-election night and post-election calling of their candidate of choice as being the ‘Next President Elect”.

And as far as any Post-Election Day challenging of any invalid voting needing to be disallowed; there is the standard defense of, “the disenfranchising of the people”, which is the argument made that in doing so you would be depriving those of their legal right to vote due to some legal technicality; especially the poor and elderly; which is even greater amongst the minorities; who no doubt unintentionally submitted their ballots incorrectly. In this case, there is no assumed legality; we are just to look the other way in this failure to follow the voting laws, and simply count their votes.

There are those who believe that there were a massive number of fraudulent votes; that if they were disallowed, it would reverse the electoral outcome. But even if they cannot be proven in the short time given from the day of the election and the swearing in day, there are at least enough of the legal voters whose ballots were completed and/or submitted incorrectly, which would make them invalid. That if these invalid votes were taken out of the equation; it would result in a Re-Election of the current President. But, with those Politicians and their various cohorts unwilling to discount the votes that were cast either illegally and/or invalidly; then it falls back to the State Legislators to reassert their Constitutional Authority and to disallow them.

Which is what has occurred, for there are State Legislators of the handful of States where the votes are being challenged, who are refusing to accept that the presumed “Candidate of Choice” as having more “Legal Votes” than the current President. And they have exercised their sole and only legal Constitutional right to direct the Electors of their States to follow their lead, and that these Electors will in turn do so. This also has actually occurred; for there were Electors who cast their State’s Electoral Vote to the current President, but not enough of them to turn the Election.

This lack of enough of State Electoral Votes being redirected to the current President, it now falls into the hands of our Federal Legislators to assert their Constitutional Authority and to refuse to accept those State Electoral decisions, since they are now being challenged, and to vote their conscience and swear in the one that they believe who had the most legal and valid votes; (I believe) that being our current President.

At the time of this article which is now just weeks away from when our next President is due to be sworn into office. We can only hope that America’s last line of defense, which was actually suppose to be its first and only line, and that is our Legislators will step up and do their duty to protect the people of The United States against an Unconstitutional Presidential Election Vote Counting.

As I close, as I did in the previous article, let me state – that regardless of which one of the Presidential Candidates becomes our next President; Christians must stay faithful to God and His Will for not only their own lives and that of their families, but – continue to pray for all of the souls of our Nation, and that God’s Will be done within and without our Country. To continue to be that voice for God in this world.

I thank you for reading this ongoing column, as I will continue to share THIS ONE MAN’S OPINION regarding subjects that matter to my God, to all of us, to all of our families, and to everyone else.

For comment just respond in the reply section below.

12/20/2020 — adt